Debate over stem cell research paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Debate over husk carrel - Research Paper characterThe issues of the stem cell enquiry have been a topic for issue since many years. The issue has nominated a division between the scientific, semipolitical and religious groups throughout the world. The issue revolves around one question When barely does the life begin? In order to get reliable stem cells and harvest the embryos cells, the scientists have to destroy it. The embryo might only contain a few cells as little as four or five, but yet has ignited a consider where religious groups affirm destroying of these cells is equal to killing a human being. Eventually, the debate entered the political area as well (Moore 7). Suddenly, these stem cells tended to be everywhere and still are. The complexity of these tiny stem cells has increased by every tick of the clock. The stem cell research has been funded by the state since years. The debate regarding the stem cells has threatened the religious beliefs, traditional all iances and challenged the wisdom of life. The political war over embryonic stem cell research There is a political war over the embryonic stem cell research and the battle is over abortion with around twists. These cells are from embryos and many of the religious groups consider the embryo as life. But it is undeniable that these stem cells are promising and can help many ailing patients thus the debate initiated that whether the stem cell research should be funded and allowed legally or not (Moore 7). The state has long been involved in the political debate of using the federal monies to fund the stem cell research. Until 1996, the federal monies were utilize to fund the stem cell research as the primary source for funding but later in the same year, the sexual intercourse had passed the Dickey-Wicker amendment which banned the funding of any research which involved the creation or destruction of the human embryo through federal monies. The Congress argued that the stem cell re search was unethical, religiously controversial and illegal. President George W. bush supported this argument as well even though many of the members of the administration had opposing views that an embryo is not a human life and it should be allowed for further research to take advantage of the voltage benefits it brings (Pressberg 65). The political controversy reshaped when President Barack Obama came into power and argued that the stem cell research should be expanded receivable to its benefits to the future of the community. The President initiated a new policy that was disliked by many of the religious scholars but cooled many at the same quantify. As the President allowed funding the stem cell research in three conditions firstly that the stem cell line was from the 22 that existed at Bushs time or had been created from the embryos which was discarded secondly that the donors were not paid for it and thirdly that the donors were clearly aware of what their embryos was bein g used for before they gave consent. Many religious scholars, who argued against the stem cell research and the fact that killing a human life (embryo) to save many others it unethical and unjustified, favoured this policy as it did not give consent to create or destroy human embryos but rather use those which were already discarded. However, this policy moved the scientists and they protested against it by filing a lawsuit in 2009. The scientists argued in the case that the new policy would increase the rival for funding affecting their chances of obtaining funds. Thus,